Coming
soon (fingers crossed): an invitation in your email, favorite social media
site, and posted on the wall where you hang out. It will include survey
questions asking you where we can go together as patient advocates. It
begins: "We’re
reaching out with an invitation to create a national patient agenda…created by
the best, brightest, most committed and passionate doers and thinkers among us.
That means you!
Who
are we? Patients/advocates/activists/caregivers like you. We sense it is the
time for change in the future of healthcare quality and WE WANT TO BE A BIGGER
PART OF IT. What ideas to you have to fix health care? What do you keep saying
that no one’s listening to? What are you doing that works, that you
could share with others, if only there was a way to do it, or a way to get paid
for the time involved in sharing it? Please read the below and add your 2 cents
– or more. The more of us take part, the more we can accomplish and more impact
we can have..."
This post is a preview "heads-up", with a little background so you'll know where it came from.
Where did it start? With the federal Partnership For Patients. (On the left is a photo of the core work group.) It developed further at the Partnership WITH Patients (a new grassroots organization) Summit in September.
Both groups are working on common goals-- to reduce preventable harm to patients, and to include the voices of patients and families in policy-making and events. The former is a federally funded organization. The latter was an off-shoot of the first. The former has funding and smarts to be effective. It's been working a plan to reduce medical harm by 40 %, and 30-day hospital re-admissions by 20 %, by 2013. IT IS HARD and SLOW WORK getting 5 or 6 thousand hospitals to row in the same direction, especially since government agencies must operate in a climate of committees, asking permission, forms in triplicate, crossing T's and dotting I's. They're trying to bring more and more patient/family voices into the mix, but it's slow going (see above about committee work). The people involved in PfP are wonderful. Committed, smart...the best we could ask for. But "nimble" and "agile" they can't be. By culture or by contract, it's their lot, working for the government (they know it; they wish it weren't so).
Frankly, we patient advocates are impatient. We feel we can offer a lot more, faster. The problem is the patient advocate community, while passionate and committed, is largely a fractured group of “one-offs”. We're made up mostly of individuals and small organizations scattered throughout the nation. We work on different issues: legislation, hospital-acquired infections, informed consent, implantable medical devices. We are all committed to improving the quality of care and the underlying culture that drives it, but have so far lacked the tools and a unified voice. Most of us were co-opted into this work by the loss of someone we love. We toil in obscurity, largely under-funded and without benefit of professional organizations or employers that sponsor our networking, learning, and travel opportunities. It's also hard for organizations to interact with us when "us" is so loosely defined. How can we tap our own numbers and collective passions, talents and energies? How can we inject ourselves usefully into this important work?
The "Partnership With Patients" Summit was evidence that our greatest asset in delivering on these goals might be social media. The Summit itself was conceived, planned, and executed using the tools of social media (Facebook, Twitter, Blogs) to get the word out, structure the event and fund it. An eclectic bunch of 70 or so patient advocates, providers and others from the full spectrum of patient advocacy carved out the time and funding to attend. The conference was produced largely by a tireless powerhouse, "Arts Advocate" Regina Holliday of Washington, DC. (For those who don't know her, Regina lost her husband Fred in 2009 to kidney cancer, leaving her with two little boys and a burning frustration at being denied Fred's medical records in time to advocate for him before he died. She painted a mural depicting this frustration and now presents, paints and speaks worldwide for patient advocacy.) As she writes about the Summit in her blog "We proved it was possible for a loose confederation of patients to gather and organize with little time and little funding. We were nimble. Each benefited from the expertise of the other. Most of all we proved this could be done.
At the Summit, more than a dozen of us (including e-Patient Dave deBronkart, Society for Participatory Medicine President-elect Michael Millenson and others) shared "Ignite" presentations (20 slides, 5 minutes). It was exhilarating to be on stage to present our views on how the patient/family voice can improve health care (at most events, we're lucky to be in the audience.) In other sessions, attendees more experienced with public speaking and using social media tutored others. An "un-conference" began in one room with attendees brainstorming solution to given topics; we immediately broke into small groups based on like passions. We came and went as the dialogue compelled us. There was not a single "death by PowerPoint".
Meet-ups in hallways, restaurants and lobbies turned into information exchanges, friendships, collaborations and lessons in using social media. And everywhere on the backs of jackets there were paintings from the "Walking Gallery", each of which tells a unique story of the wearer's (often unfortunate) interaction with the medical system. Regina painted most of these herself (including several in the hotel the evening before the conference started). Though we didn't need them quite as much in this crowd of peers, they present a "face" to the struggles of our advocacy and a tribute to those we've lost.
On the last day of the Summit, Regina and I hosted a session on the future of patient advocacy. What could we, should we do, together? We recorded the crowd's ideas on a white board. There was overwhelming support for the concept of developing a unified agenda. We took photos of the white boards and are working off of them to produce the survey we will ultimately bring to you.
Where did it start? With the federal Partnership For Patients. (On the left is a photo of the core work group.) It developed further at the Partnership WITH Patients (a new grassroots organization) Summit in September.
Partnership FOR Patients work group discussing "The Moral Imperative" of preventing harm, Sept. 20, 2012 |
Both groups are working on common goals-- to reduce preventable harm to patients, and to include the voices of patients and families in policy-making and events. The former is a federally funded organization. The latter was an off-shoot of the first. The former has funding and smarts to be effective. It's been working a plan to reduce medical harm by 40 %, and 30-day hospital re-admissions by 20 %, by 2013. IT IS HARD and SLOW WORK getting 5 or 6 thousand hospitals to row in the same direction, especially since government agencies must operate in a climate of committees, asking permission, forms in triplicate, crossing T's and dotting I's. They're trying to bring more and more patient/family voices into the mix, but it's slow going (see above about committee work). The people involved in PfP are wonderful. Committed, smart...the best we could ask for. But "nimble" and "agile" they can't be. By culture or by contract, it's their lot, working for the government (they know it; they wish it weren't so).
Frankly, we patient advocates are impatient. We feel we can offer a lot more, faster. The problem is the patient advocate community, while passionate and committed, is largely a fractured group of “one-offs”. We're made up mostly of individuals and small organizations scattered throughout the nation. We work on different issues: legislation, hospital-acquired infections, informed consent, implantable medical devices. We are all committed to improving the quality of care and the underlying culture that drives it, but have so far lacked the tools and a unified voice. Most of us were co-opted into this work by the loss of someone we love. We toil in obscurity, largely under-funded and without benefit of professional organizations or employers that sponsor our networking, learning, and travel opportunities. It's also hard for organizations to interact with us when "us" is so loosely defined. How can we tap our own numbers and collective passions, talents and energies? How can we inject ourselves usefully into this important work?
The "Partnership With Patients" Summit was evidence that our greatest asset in delivering on these goals might be social media. The Summit itself was conceived, planned, and executed using the tools of social media (Facebook, Twitter, Blogs) to get the word out, structure the event and fund it. An eclectic bunch of 70 or so patient advocates, providers and others from the full spectrum of patient advocacy carved out the time and funding to attend. The conference was produced largely by a tireless powerhouse, "Arts Advocate" Regina Holliday of Washington, DC. (For those who don't know her, Regina lost her husband Fred in 2009 to kidney cancer, leaving her with two little boys and a burning frustration at being denied Fred's medical records in time to advocate for him before he died. She painted a mural depicting this frustration and now presents, paints and speaks worldwide for patient advocacy.) As she writes about the Summit in her blog "We proved it was possible for a loose confederation of patients to gather and organize with little time and little funding. We were nimble. Each benefited from the expertise of the other. Most of all we proved this could be done.
"Remember where this saga began?", she writes. " On May 22nd , we were told there was no funding to gather patients to talk about goals of the Partnership for Patients campaign. Pat Mastors and I thought we had to do something to change this. Kathy Nicholls helped create a website and we began to plan. In the months hence we worked with the team from Weber-Shandwick [the PfP contracting vendor] and the Partnership for Patients team from CMS to open up communication between an ever larger group of patients. Representatives were able to come to our Kansas City summit from both Weber-Shandwick and CMS."
The PWP Summit also showed the power of new "crowd-funding" web platform Medstartr.com to overcome funding challenges. Regina posted a project there, offering shout-outs on Twitter and Facebook, plus her paintings, as rewards to backers. The project was funded at 219%, raising $10,948.00. HealthTechHatch and the Society for Participatory Medicine also hosted a travel fund, raising another $6,0000-plus dollars to provide 9 travel scholarships. Cerner donated the conference space.
Regina Holliday, Pat Mastors |
The "Un-conference": great ideas, great energy |
In the halls at PWP- facing us in the center is Teresa Titus Howard, Deputy Group Director, CMS Innovation Center |
My "Ignite" Presentation at PWP Summit. (Note to self: don't wear black when standing in front of a black curtain) |
Meet-ups in hallways, restaurants and lobbies turned into information exchanges, friendships, collaborations and lessons in using social media. And everywhere on the backs of jackets there were paintings from the "Walking Gallery", each of which tells a unique story of the wearer's (often unfortunate) interaction with the medical system. Regina painted most of these herself (including several in the hotel the evening before the conference started). Though we didn't need them quite as much in this crowd of peers, they present a "face" to the struggles of our advocacy and a tribute to those we've lost.
One page of white board takeaways |
So what do you say? What do you think about "crowd sourcing" a focused agenda for the patient advocate community? Would you want to be part of it? Would you help?
I will be a part of it. I will help.
ReplyDeleteThat's great, Bart. Thank you!
ReplyDeletePat,
ReplyDeleteI'd love to help. I still can't believe Regina got us all together with so little time. She one said "If you push me I'll push back." It was also wonderful to meet you during our #cinderblocks gathering.
Lisa
Thanks, Lisa! Yes, there was great energy there. Makes me believe the agenda outlined in post is achievable. And it was great to meet you too! Please spread the word so people will be looking for the invitation and survey when it's ready.
ReplyDeleteI'm in. Let me know what I can do!
ReplyDeletePS - My friends in Colorado got a patient pod and love it.
Erin, thank you! It was great to meet you in KC...and glad the Patient Pod helped your friend.
ReplyDelete